The Definition of Compensation Management:
The Definition of Compensation
Management:
In simple
terms, compensation is everything
that a company offers its employees in return for their talent and time. When
organized the right way, compensation dollars can be strategically leveraged to
reduce turnover, boost employee engagement and attract top talent. The purpose
of compensation management is to make the most of company dollars in a way that
rewards employees for their work.
Employee
salary : Basic pay + Grade pay + Dearness
Allowance (DA) + House Rent Allowance (HRA) + City
Compensatory Allowance (CCA)
The details of above said components of salary of
government employees are as follows.
- Basic pay: The primary component of employee salary which is bases for
calculation of other components in the employee salary.
- Grade pay: An amount which is fixed by the government on the
range of employee in government hierarchy. (for example; Group A
officers have high grade pay than Group B officers.)
- Dearness Allowance: Certain percentage of the amount on basic
pay. This percentage varies from state government to Central government
employees. An allowance paid to employees on the basis of consumer
Price index. Consumer price index denotes the cost of the products which
influences by the inflation. (in simple terms cost of living) At present,
41% is for state government employees and 72 % is for Central government
employees as dearness allowance on their basic pay.
- House Rent Allowance (HRA): Certain percentage of the amount on basic pay.
This percentage varies from state government to Central government
employees. This allowance is paid to employees are meeting house rent
expenditure.
- City Compensatory Allowance (CCA): An allowance paid according to the city or town
where employee do the job and the purpose of this allowance is to
compensate high cost of living especially in cities like Mumbai, Delhi,
Calcutta and Hyderabad et cetera . Government decides the amount of
allowance to be paid to employees on basis of city or town.
Objective of
Compensation
The objective of the compensation function is to create a system of rewards that is equitable to the employer and employee alike. The desired outcome is an employee who is attracted to the work and motivated to do a good job for the employer. Patton suggests that in compensation policy there are seven criteria for effectiveness. Compensation should be:
The objective of the compensation function is to create a system of rewards that is equitable to the employer and employee alike. The desired outcome is an employee who is attracted to the work and motivated to do a good job for the employer. Patton suggests that in compensation policy there are seven criteria for effectiveness. Compensation should be:
- Adequate Minimal governmental, union, and managerial
levels should be met.
- Equitable Each person should be paid fairly, in line with
his or her effort, abilities, and training.
- Balanced Pay, benefits, and other rewards should provide
a reasonable total reward package.
- Cost-effective Pay should not be excessive, considering what the
organization can afford to pay.
- Secure Pay should be enough to help an employee feel secure
and aid him or her in satisfying basic needs.
- Incentive-providing Pay should motivate effective and
productive work.
- Acceptable to the
employee The
employee should understand the pay system and feel it is a reasonable
system for the enterprise and himself or herself.
3P Compensation Management: Pay for
Position, Person and Performance
Paying for Position ƒDevelop an equitable grading structure ƒCreate a reference salary structure oƒ Leverage compensation costs
with market survey inform
Pay for Person Determine competency requirements and employee
capabilities Pay individuals based on their competency match with the position
Identify and pay market premium for competencies in short supply in the market
Paying for Performance Design annual bonus and incentives plans that
motivate staff Shift from merit salary increases to variable pay Create
long-term reward plans - stock options, deferred compensation and phantom
The compensation policy is
the basic document, which drives the detail of the compensation practices in
the organization. As the compensation strategy sets the high level compensation
goals of the organization, the compensation policy describes the details of the
individual compensation components, their behavior and their role in the
compensation scheme of the organization.
What is the
compensation policy?
The compensation
policy describes
the details of the compensation components in
the organization, how they are used and the conditions for the employees as the
compensation component can be applied in their specific situation. Each
organization uses many compensation components and they have to be described.
The compensation policy provides the basic explanation of the compensation
component, how it is calculated, who is eligible for the usage and the approval
procedure.
What is important
in the compensation policy?
The
compensation policy has to be transparent and
it has to provide just the only way of the interpretation. It is
extremely important, the employees and managers are not unsure about the
compensation component and they understand clearly, what conditions are applied
for the approval of the specific compensation component.
The
transparent compensation policy supports the high performance corporate culture
organization as the employees understand, what behavior and performance levels
are expected to be eligible for the specific compensation component and it
drives the behavior and performance specifically the right way for the
organization.
The
policy has to cover all the compensation components, which are used in the
organization and affects large populations. The exceptional managerial
component tools can be referenced from the general compensation policy, but
they should not stay hidden. The employees cannot trust the compensation policy,
which does not mention all the compensation components.
Examples of Compensation Policies
Compensation policies range from basic shift differentials for employees
who work outside normal business hours – such as swing shifts or graveyard
shifts – to strategies that reward employees for high-level performance that
reaches organizational goals. In addition, employers regularly monitor their
compensation policies to ensure they are paying employees in an equitable
manner and as competitively as possible when compared to other businesses in
the industry.
Employee Incentives
Employee incentives are a part of some employers’
compensation policies. Incentives can be based on number of factors, such as
performance, sales or other standards the company uses to reward employees for
attaining organizational and career goals. For example, employees whose sales
exceed the company’s expectations might be eligible for an incentive if their
sales performance meets certain guidelines. Guidelines employers use for sales
incentives include actual sales figures, repeat customer sales or sales to
customers within the company’s emerging markets. Employee incentives are almost
always specifically outlined using eligibility criteria to eliminate gray areas
about performance expectations.
Merit Increases
Performance appraisal reviews are an integral part
of compensation policies on merit increases. Employers typically require that
supervisors and managers conduct performance appraisals for employees who
report to them. Performance appraisals use job descriptions, performance
standards and work logs to determine if employees are meeting the employer’s
expectations in terms of productivity and quality of work. Companies that use
merit increases to reward employees rely on supervisor ratings to determine
salary or wage increases, referred to as merit increases. Merit increases
generally have specific percentage increases for employees who attain certain
performance ratings. An example of merit increase guidelines might be 5 percent
and 8 percent increases for employees who meet and exceed performance
expectations, respectively.
Pay for Performance
A pay-for-performance compensation policy is
similar to a merit increase because it’s based on employee performance. The
difference between a merit increase and a pay-for-performance policy is that
pay-for-performance increases are not usually limited to specific percentages
based on achieving a certain rating. Pay-for-performance policies increase
employee salaries based on performance that advances the organization’s goals.
One of the characteristics of a pay-for-performance compensation policy is that
managers have more latitude in determining the amount of a salary increase. For
example, a lawyer who brings a substantial amount of business or a large number
of clients to the law firm may be eligible for an increase based on a
pay-for-performance compensation policy.
Annual Review
Human resources staff or compensation and benefits
specialists should review compensation policies annually basis to ensure the
company is maintaining a competitive edge. An example of using annual reviews
to strengthen competitive compensation policies occurs when employers effect
salary adjustments based on market pricing for employees with skills and
qualifications in high demand. Another example involves adjusting salaries and
wages in accordance with cost of living increases. Reviewing compensation
policies regularly also ensures the company is in compliance with federal
regulations concerning fair pay, minimum wage and overtime rules. During annual
compensation reviews, some employers audit their policies related to exempt and
non-exempt status. The U.S. Department of Labor enforces the Fair Labor
Standards Act guidelines pertaining to exempt and non-exempt employee
classifications and provides technical support and guidance to employers who
need assistance in this area.
Comments
Post a Comment